51 Papers Ditch Bush
“51 papers ditch Bush – Amazing”
Editorial
Charleston Gazette
November 1, 2004
Remarkably, 51 American newspapers that endorsed Republican George W. Bush in the 2000 general election have renounced him after watching his performance in office. Forty switched their support to Democratic nominee John Kerry for Tuesday’s balloting, and 11 others abstained from endorsing anyone.
For example, Florida’s large Orlando Sentinel has backed every Republican nominee since 1968 — but not this year. “This president has utterly failed to fulfill our expectations,” the paper declared, urging its quarter-million readers to vote for Kerry.
The Seattle Times said: “Four years ago, this page endorsed Bush for president. We cannot do so again — because of an ill-conceived war and its aftermath, undisciplined spending, a shrinkage of constitutional rights and an intrusive social agenda.”
The Portland Oregonian, which backed the Republican in 2000, lamented that Bush “promised to reach out to unite the country. If anything, he has helped make the rifts deeper. That may be his real failure as president. Kerry can do better.”
The South Florida Sun-Sentinel said: “The nation simply cannot afford misjudgments like those that led to the Iraq quagmire, and deficits so large they prevent the nation from adequately providing for its armed forces, addressing homeland security needs, and guaranteeing the solvency of Medicare and Social Security. The Bush administration has fallen short on the foreign policy and fiscal fronts.”
The Palm Beach Post said: “Issue by issue, Kerry has laid out a better, fairer, more progressive agenda. He would shore up Social Security, not endanger Americans’ retirement by disguising a risky privatization scheme as part of an ‘ownership society.’ He would allow embryonic stem-cell research, not thwart hope by yielding to a narrow ideology. He would offer Americans the promise of health care that is available to members of Congress....”
In contrast, only six newspapers that endorsed Democrat Al Gore in 2000 switched to Republican Bush this year. Altogether, according to Editor & Publisher magazine, Kerry is endorsed by 172 papers with 19 million circulation, while Bush is backed by 137 papers with 12 million circulation.
Since many newspaper readers are thinking people with considerable political knowledge, we don’t know if they’re swayed by a paper’s endorsement. And newspapers probably have little effect on the bedrock of Republican Party support, white fundamentalists.
At the University of Michigan last week, Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Seymour Hersh was asked why so many Americans remain loyal to the president. He replied: “One thing you have to face up to is the fact that there are roughly 70 million people in America who do not believe in evolution — and those are Bush supporters.”
Newspaper endorsements are unlikely to faze such ardent and convinced backers. However, we hope that mainstream Americans at least give sober consideration to papers’ views.
1 Comments:
Just thought I'd share my response to Sinclair Broadcasting's Mark Hyman and his anti-Kerry ramblings on his editorial segment "The Point."
http://thecounterpoint.blogspot.com
Yes, Mark: let's choose up sides.
You can have Halliburton and Enron; we’ll take the union guy working third shift at the plant.
You can have the corporate executives; we’ll take those who’ve lost their jobs—all one million of them.
You can have the xenophobic rubes; we’ll take the immigrant who still believes America is a land of both compassion and opportunity.
You can have the folks who don’t even know what positions their own candidate believes in; we’ll take the folks who read a paper once in a while.
You can have the chicken hawks who send working class kids to war as they make millions; we’ll take the guy who actually served.
You can have the holier-than-thou Bible thumpers who claim to know the mind of God; we’ll take the devout and humble of any faith who use their religious beliefs to guide their lives, not to pass judgment on others.
You can have the HMO executives and the drug companies; we’ll take the uninsured citizens of the wealthiest nation on the planet.
You can have the corporate polluters; we’ll take the children growing up breathing toxic air.
You can have the rich who have had their taxes slashed while we spend billions on war and explode the deficit; we’ll take middle-class Americans who are now shouldering most of the tax burden.
You can have those who claim they want to wage a “culture war;” we’ll take those who want to build bridges.
You’ve got all the liars; the truth-tellers are on our side.
Take the people who talk about fighting terrorism; we’ll take those who actually make us safer.
The NRA is all yours; we’ll take the cops on the beat who face well-armed criminals.
You can have the militia members, John Birchers, and homophobes; we’ll take the union members, the civil rights activists, and the environmentalists.
You can have the Pentagon brass; we’ll take the homeless vet whose VA benefits have been cut.
The folks with a vacation home in the Hamptons or in Aspen? All you, Mark; we’ve got the single working mom pulling a double shift to put food on the table for her kids.
You can have the people who talk about not leaving a child behind; we’ll take the children that get left behind.
You can have the Commander in Chief who can’t be bothered to attend a single funeral of a fallen soldier; we’ll take that soldier’s widow and children.
You can have those who appeal to fear; we’ll take those who call on us to hope.
You’re right, Mark. Character isn’t something you can buy. It has to be earned. It has to be earned by serving your society. It can’t be inherited like a famous family name. It can’t be donated to you by deep-pocketed donors. It can’t be won by sending others to kill and be killed. It isn’t given to you no matter how much you flaunt your supposed piety. It’s earned day in and day out, usually without anyone else watching. It’s earned by telling the truth. It’s earned by standing up for those who can’t stand up for themselves. It’s earned by looking out for those who get left behind or who are looked down on. It’s earned by fighting the good fight. It’s earned by hard work and deep thinking. It’s earned by self examination. It’s earned by having integrity.
And that’s The Counterpoint.
Ted Remington
http://thecounterpoint.blogspot.com
Post a Comment
<< Home